ATI Radeon X800 CrossFire Edition vs Pro W5500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking296not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.01no data
Power efficiency13.15no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameNavi 14R423
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 February 2020 (5 years ago)28 October 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408no data
Core clock speed1187 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Wattno data
Texture fill rate123.28.000
Floating-point processing power3.942 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3216
TMUs8816
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s32 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 February 2020 28 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 130 nm

Pro W5500 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W5500 and Radeon X800 CrossFire Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5500 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X800 CrossFire Edition is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W5500
Radeon Pro W5500
ATI Radeon X800 CrossFire Edition
Radeon X800 CrossFire Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 91 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 10 votes

Rate Radeon X800 CrossFire Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W5500 or Radeon X800 CrossFire Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.