H200 NVL vs Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 136 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 7.22 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 5.28 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) | Hopper (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | Vega 20 | GH100 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 June 2019 (5 years ago) | 18 November 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,399 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 ×2 | 16896 |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1365 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 13,230 million | 80,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 475 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 440.3 ×2 | 942.5 |
| Floating-point processing power | 14.09 TFLOPS ×2 | 60.32 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 24 |
| TMUs | 256 ×2 | 528 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 528 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | Apple MPX | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | Quad-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 8-pin EPS |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | HBM3e |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB ×2 | 141 GB |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit ×2 | 5120 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1313 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 1.02 TB/s ×2 | 3.36 TB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | N/A |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 9.0 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 June 2019 | 18 November 2024 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 141 GB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 475 Watt | 600 Watt |
Pro Vega II Duo has 26.3% lower power consumption.
H200 NVL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 340.6% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and H200 NVL. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
