Radeon Instinct MI300 vs Pro Vega 64X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking192not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.83no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10Aqua Vanjaram
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date19 March 2019 (6 years ago)4 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409614080
Core clock speed1250 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate375.81,496
Floating-point processing power12.03 TFLOPS47.87 TFLOPS
ROPs64no data
TMUs256880
Tensor Coresno data880
L1 Cache1 MB3.4 MB
L2 Cache4 MB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB128 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s3,277 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.125N/A
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 March 2019 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 600 Watt

Pro Vega 64X has 140% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 64X and Radeon Instinct MI300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI300 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
Radeon Instinct MI300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 38 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 27 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64X or Radeon Instinct MI300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.