Qualcomm Adreno 840 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking190not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.82no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)no data
GPU code nameVega 10no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date19 March 2019 (6 years ago)24 September 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096no data
Core clock speed1250 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1468 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate375.8no data
Floating-point processing power12.03 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs256no data
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width2048 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.1.125-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 March 2019 24 September 2025

Qualcomm Adreno 840 has an age advantage of 6 years.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 64X and Qualcomm Adreno 840. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation graphics card while Qualcomm Adreno 840 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Qualcomm Adreno 840
Adreno 840

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 38 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64X or Qualcomm Adreno 840, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.