GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking190not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.81no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega 10TU106
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date19 March 2019 (6 years ago)9 July 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962176
Core clock speed1250 MHz1470 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHz1530 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate375.8208.1
Floating-point processing power12.03 TFLOPS6.659 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs256136
Tensor Coresno data272
Ray Tracing Coresno data34
L1 Cache1 MB2.1 MB
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 March 2019 9 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 175 Watt

Pro Vega 64X has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 64X and GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 38 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 203 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64X or GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.