Riva TNT2 PRO vs Radeon Pro Vega 64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking202not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.50no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameVega 10NV5 B6
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date27 June 2017 (8 years ago)12 October 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096no data
Core clock speed1250 MHz143 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million15 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate345.60.29
Floating-point processing power11.06 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs2562
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length267 mmno data
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2SDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB32 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz167 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s2.672 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2017 12 October 1999
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 250 nm

Pro Vega 64 has an age advantage of 17 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1686% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 64 and Riva TNT2 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64 is a workstation graphics card while Riva TNT2 PRO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 23 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 29 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64 or Riva TNT2 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.