NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

Pro Vega 56
8 GB HBM2
31.89
+177%

Radeon Pro Vega 56 outperforms Quadro P1000 by 177% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking162380
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money2.927.48
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameVegaGP107
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date14 December 2017 (6 years old)1 February 2017 (7 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $375
Current price$4999 (12.5x MSRP)$301 (0.8x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P1000 has 156% better value for money than Pro Vega 56.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584640
Core clock speed1247 MHz1493 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1519 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate280.059.20
Floating-point performance9,677 gflops1,894 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm145 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s80.19 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.2
CUDAno data6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 56 31.89
+177%
Quadro P1000 11.50

Radeon Pro Vega 56 outperforms Quadro P1000 by 177% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro Vega 56 12353
+177%
Quadro P1000 4453

Radeon Pro Vega 56 outperforms Quadro P1000 by 177% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pro Vega 56 25589
+326%
Quadro P1000 6001

Radeon Pro Vega 56 outperforms Quadro P1000 by 326% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pro Vega 56 17797
+272%
Quadro P1000 4787

Radeon Pro Vega 56 outperforms Quadro P1000 by 272% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Pro Vega 56 62249
+340%
Quadro P1000 14132

Radeon Pro Vega 56 outperforms Quadro P1000 by 340% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pro Vega 56 65703
+406%
Quadro P1000 12981

Radeon Pro Vega 56 outperforms Quadro P1000 by 406% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99
+120%
45
−120%
4K57
+418%
11
−418%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+200%
18−20
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+150%
24−27
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+211%
18−20
−211%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+151%
35−40
−151%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+187%
30−33
−187%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+200%
18−20
−200%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+159%
32
−159%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+158%
30−35
−158%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+149%
40−45
−149%
Hitman 3 95−100
+230%
30−33
−230%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+188%
24−27
−188%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+155%
20−22
−155%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
+208%
24−27
−208%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+186%
21−24
−186%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+150%
24−27
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+211%
18−20
−211%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+151%
35−40
−151%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+187%
30−33
−187%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+200%
18−20
−200%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+186%
29
−186%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+158%
30−35
−158%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+149%
40−45
−149%
Hitman 3 95−100
+230%
30−33
−230%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+188%
24−27
−188%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+224%
16−18
−224%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+155%
20−22
−155%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
+208%
24−27
−208%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116
+287%
30
−287%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+186%
21−24
−186%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+150%
24−27
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+211%
18−20
−211%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+151%
35−40
−151%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+200%
18−20
−200%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+207%
27
−207%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+158%
30−35
−158%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+149%
40−45
−149%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+300%
16
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+186%
21−24
−186%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+200%
16−18
−200%
Hitman 3 55−60
+211%
18−20
−211%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+153%
16−18
−153%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+240%
10−11
−240%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+213%
8−9
−213%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+200%
14−16
−200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+218%
10−12
−218%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+325%
8−9
−325%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+229%
21−24
−229%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+217%
18−20
−217%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+205%
20−22
−205%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+205%
21−24
−205%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+282%
10−12
−282%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+238%
8−9
−238%
Hitman 3 30−35
+182%
10−12
−182%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42
+320%
10−11
−320%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+290%
10−11
−290%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+222%
9−10
−222%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+200%
14−16
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%

This is how Pro Vega 56 and Quadro P1000 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Pro Vega 56 is 120% faster than Quadro P1000

4K resolution:

  • Pro Vega 56 is 418% faster than Quadro P1000

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro Vega 56 is 350% faster than the Quadro P1000.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro Vega 56 surpassed Quadro P1000 in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 31.89 11.50
Recency 14 December 2017 1 February 2017
Cost $399 $375
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 40 Watt

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P1000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Radeon Pro Vega 56
NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 88 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 457 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.