RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon Pro Vega 48

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking243not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10AD104
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date19 March 2019 (6 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30725120
Core clock speed1200 MHz1725 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rate249.6360.0
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS23.04 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs192160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cache768 KB5 MB
L2 Cache4 MB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 March 2019 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation has an age advantage of 4 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 48 and RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 48 is a mobile workstation graphics card while RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Radeon Pro Vega 48
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 78 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 4 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 48 or RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.