Quadro K2000M Embedded vs Radeon Pro Vega 48

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking241not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameVega 10EXK107
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date19 March 2019 (6 years ago)22 March 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072384
Core clock speed1200 MHz835 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1058 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rate249.633.86
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS0.8125 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs19232
L1 Cache768 KB32 KB
L2 Cache4 MB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.0 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.1
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.125N/A
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 March 2019 22 March 2012
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

Pro Vega 48 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 48 and Quadro K2000M Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Radeon Pro Vega 48
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M Embedded
Quadro K2000M Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 78 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro K2000M Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 48 or Quadro K2000M Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.