H200 NVL vs Radeon Pro Vega 48

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking193not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Hopper (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10GH100
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date19 March 2019 (5 years ago)18 November 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores307216896
Core clock speed1200 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data600 Watt
Texture fill rate249.6942.5
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS60.32 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs192528
Tensor Coresno data528

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB141 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s3.36 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.125N/A
CUDA-9.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 March 2019 18 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 141 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

H200 NVL has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1662.5% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 48 and H200 NVL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 48 is a mobile workstation card while H200 NVL is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Radeon Pro Vega 48
NVIDIA H200 NVL
H200 NVL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 75 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate H200 NVL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.