UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile vs Radeon Pro Vega 20

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking435not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.49no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameVega 12Tiger Lake GT1
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date14 November 2018 (7 years ago)2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280128
Core clock speed815 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1283 MHz1450 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate102.611.60
Floating-point processing power3.284 TFLOPS0.3712 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs808
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width1024 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed740 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth189.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 20 and UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 20 is a mobile workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Intel UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile
UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 87 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 12 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 20 or UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.