PG506-217 vs Radeon Pro Vega 20
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 432 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 9.42 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Ampere (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | Vega 12 | GA100 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 14 November 2018 (6 years ago) | 12 April 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 3584 |
| Core clock speed | 815 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1283 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 54,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 165 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 102.6 | 322.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | 3.284 TFLOPS | 10.32 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 96 |
| TMUs | 80 | 224 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 10.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | 24 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 8-pin EPS |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 3072 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 740 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 189.4 GB/s | 933.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | N/A |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 8.0 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 November 2018 | 12 April 2021 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 24 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 165 Watt |
Pro Vega 20 has 65% lower power consumption.
PG506-217, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 20 and PG506-217. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 20 is a mobile workstation graphics card while PG506-217 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
