RTX A5000 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro Vega 16

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking454not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.78no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameVega 12GA104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date14 November 2018 (7 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10246144
Core clock speed815 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate76.16259.2
Floating-point processing power2.437 TFLOPS16.59 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs64192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cache256 KB6 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth307.2 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 November 2018 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 80 Watt

Pro Vega 16 has 6.7% lower power consumption.

RTX A5000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 16 and RTX A5000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Radeon Pro Vega 16
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Max-Q
RTX A5000 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 12 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 6 votes

Rate RTX A5000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 16 or RTX A5000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.