GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 447 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 11.69 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) |
| GPU code name | Vega 12 | GB203 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 14 November 2018 (6 years ago) | 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $749 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 8960 |
| Core clock speed | 815 MHz | 2295 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 2452 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 45,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 76.16 | 686.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.437 TFLOPS | 43.94 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 96 |
| TMUs | 64 | 280 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 280 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 70 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 8.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | 48 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 304 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 307.2 GB/s | 896.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.4 |
| CUDA | - | 12.0 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 350 Watt |
Pro Vega 16 has 366.7% lower power consumption.
RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 16 and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
