Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 456 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 11.81 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Generation 12.5 (2021−2023) |
| GPU code name | Vega 12 | Ponte Vecchio |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 14 November 2018 (7 years ago) | 10 January 2023 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 16384 ×4 |
| Core clock speed | 815 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 100,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 2400 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 76.16 | 1,638 ×4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.437 TFLOPS | 52.43 TFLOPS ×4 |
| ROPs | 32 | no data |
| TMUs | 64 | 1024 ×4 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 1024 ×4 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 128 ×4 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 64 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | 408 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | HBM2e |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 GB ×4 |
| Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 8192 Bit ×4 |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1565 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 307.2 GB/s | 3,205 GB/s ×4 |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 November 2018 | 10 January 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 2400 Watt |
Pro Vega 16 has 3100% lower power consumption.
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Data Center GPU Max Subsystem. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Data Center GPU Max Subsystem is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
