GRID RTX T10-8 vs Radeon Pro VII

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking174not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.17no data
Power efficiency9.16no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega 20TU102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$1,899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38403584
Core clock speed1400 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz1395 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate408.0312.5
Floating-point processing power13.06 TFLOPS9.999 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs240224
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length305 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 150 Watt

Pro VII has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

GRID RTX T10-8, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro VII and GRID RTX T10-8. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10-8
GRID RTX T10-8

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 1938 votes

Rate Radeon Pro VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 40 votes

Rate GRID RTX T10-8 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro VII or GRID RTX T10-8, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.