Radeon RX 6900 vs Pro V7350X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated35
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.25
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameEllesmereNavi 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release dateno data28 October 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23044608
Core clock speed1188 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1243 MHz2105 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million23,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt255 Watt
Texture fill rate179.0606.2
Floating-point processing powerno data19.4 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs144288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7 GB/s16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.31.2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 255 Watt

Pro V7350X2 has 27.5% lower power consumption.

RX 6900, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V7350X2 and Radeon RX 6900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V7350X2 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6900 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2
Radeon Pro V7350X2
AMD Radeon RX 6900
Radeon RX 6900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro V7350X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 90 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V7350X2 or Radeon RX 6900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.