Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 vs Radeon Pro V620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking136not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.56no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)no data
GPU code nameNavi 21no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date4 November 2021 (4 years ago)29 September 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4608no data
Core clock speed1825 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2200 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)300 Wattno data
Texture fill rate633.6no data
Floating-point processing power20.28 TFLOPSno data
ROPs128no data
TMUs288no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data
L0 Cache1.1 MBno data
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data
L3 Cache128 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount32 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 November 2021 29 September 2025

Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 has an age advantage of 3 years.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V620 and Qualcomm Adreno X2-85. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V620 is a workstation graphics card while Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro V620
Radeon Pro V620
Qualcomm Adreno X2-85
Adreno X2-85

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V620 or Qualcomm Adreno X2-85, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.