Arc 140T Mobile vs Radeon Pro V620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking52not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.55no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Xe2-LPG (2025)
GPU code nameNavi 21Arrow Lake
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date4 November 2021 (3 years ago)13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46081024
Core clock speed1825 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz2350 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate633.6150.4
Floating-point processing power20.28 TFLOPS4.813 TFLOPS
ROPs12832
TMUs28864
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Cores728

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 November 2021 13 January 2025
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 35 Watt

Arc 140T Mobile has an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 757.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V620 and Arc 140T Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V620 is a workstation card while Arc 140T Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro V620
Radeon Pro V620
Intel Arc 140T Mobile
Arc 140T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc 140T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V620 or Arc 140T Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.