Radeon HD 8210E vs Pro V5300X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1304
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.93
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameBaffinKalindi
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release dateno data23 April 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024128
Core clock speed1125 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt9 Watt
Texture fill rate76.862.400
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0768 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed6 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.76.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 9 Watt

Pro V5300X has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

HD 8210E, on the other hand, has 455.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V5300X and Radeon HD 8210E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V5300X is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 8210E is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro V5300X
Radeon Pro V5300X
AMD Radeon HD 8210E
Radeon HD 8210E

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro V5300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 26 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8210E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V5300X or Radeon HD 8210E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.