Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs Radeon Pro V520

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking217not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.03no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)no data
GPU code nameNavi 12no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 December 2020 (5 years ago)6 January 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230432
Core clock speed1000 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHz1800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)225 Wattno data
Texture fill rate230.4no data
Floating-point processing power7.373 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs144no data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width2048 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2020 6 January 2025

Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) has an age advantage of 4 years.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V520 and Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V520 is a workstation graphics card while Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V520 or Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.