Xe DG1 vs Radeon Pro V320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameVega 10DG1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date29 June 2017 (8 years ago)2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584640
Core clock speed852 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate336.062.00
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPS1.984 TFLOPS
ROPs6420
TMUs22440
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache4 MB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mm164 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s68.26 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 30 Watt

Pro V320 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Xe DG1, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 667% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V320 and Xe DG1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V320 is a workstation graphics card while Xe DG1 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 34 votes

Rate Xe DG1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V320 or Xe DG1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.