Radeon Pro 5600M vs Pro V320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated289
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data34.19
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameVega 10Navi 12
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date29 June 2017 (8 years ago)15 June 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842560
Core clock speed852 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1030 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate336.0164.8
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPS5.274 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs224160
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz770 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s394.2 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.31.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2017 15 June 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 50 Watt

Pro 5600M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 360% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V320 and Radeon Pro 5600M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V320 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 84 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V320 or Radeon Pro 5600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.