Radeon Pro W5300M vs Pro V320 MxGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameVega 10Navi 14
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date29 June 2017 (8 years ago)13 November 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584 ×21280
Core clock speed852 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate224.0 ×2100.0
Floating-point processing power7.168 TFLOPS ×23.2 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×232
TMUs224 ×280

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB ×24 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s ×2192.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2017 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 85 Watt

Pro V320 MxGPU has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro W5300M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 170.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU and Radeon Pro W5300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro W5300M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU
AMD Radeon Pro W5300M
Radeon Pro W5300M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro W5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU or Radeon Pro W5300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.