RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated71
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data54.20
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10AD104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date29 June 2017 (8 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584 ×26144
Core clock speed852 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate224.0 ×2299.5
Floating-point processing power7.168 TFLOPS ×219.17 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×264
TMUs224 ×2192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cache896 KB6 MB
L2 Cache4 MB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm168 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB ×220 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit ×2160 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s ×2280.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2017 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has an age advantage of 5 years, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 228.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 58 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU or RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.