NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated56
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data9.95
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameVega 10TU102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date29 June 2017 (6 years old)13 August 2018 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299
Current priceno data$3083 (0.5x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35844608
Core clock speed852 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate224.0509.8

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB24 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1890 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131
CUDAno data7.5

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 29 June 2017 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 260 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU and Quadro RTX 6000. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


This video card has no user ratings yet.

Rate AMD Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 121 vote

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.