Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) |
| GPU code name | Vega 10 | Tiger Lake GT2 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 29 June 2017 (8 years ago) | 2 September 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3584 ×2 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 852 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 12,500 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 224.0 ×2 | 52.80 |
| Floating-point processing power | 7.168 TFLOPS ×2 | 1.69 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 24 |
| TMUs | 224 ×2 | 48 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | Ring Bus |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB ×2 | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit ×2 | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 945 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s ×2 | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.125 | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 June 2017 | 2 September 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 15 Watt |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 1433.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU is a workstation graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
