Quadro4 400 NVS PCI vs Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameEllesmereNV17 A3
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date24 April 2017 (8 years ago)16 July 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304 ×2no data
Core clock speed1243 MHz220 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate179.0 ×20.88 ×2
Floating-point processing power5.728 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs32 ×22 ×2
TMUs144 ×24 ×2
L1 Cache576 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB ×264 MB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2128 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1750 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s ×25.312 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a2x LFH60
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)8.0
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 April 2017 16 July 2004
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 18 Watt

Pro Duo Polaris has an age advantage of 12 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro4 400 NVS PCI, on the other hand, has 1288.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and Quadro4 400 NVS PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
NVIDIA Quadro4 400 NVS PCI
Quadro4 400 NVS PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 35 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Duo Polaris on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 400 NVS PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Duo Polaris or Quadro4 400 NVS PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.