FirePro S9010 vs Radeon Pro 580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking326not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.49no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 20Tahiti
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date5 June 2017 (8 years ago)24 August 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041792
Core clock speed1100 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate172.889.60
Floating-point processing power5.53 TFLOPS2.867 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs144112
L1 Cache576 KB448 KB
L2 Cache2 MB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB3 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1695 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth217.0 GB/s240.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2017 24 August 2012
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 200 Watt

Pro 580 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 580 and FirePro S9010. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 580 is a mobile workstation graphics card while FirePro S9010 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 580
Radeon Pro 580
AMD FirePro S9010
FirePro S9010

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 75 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate FirePro S9010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 580 or FirePro S9010, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.