ATI All-In-Wonder X800 SE vs Radeon Pro 580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking327not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.49no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code namePolaris 20R420
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date5 June 2017 (8 years ago)27 April 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speed1100 MHz425 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rate172.83.400
Floating-point processing power5.53 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs1448
L1 Cache576 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1695 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth217.0 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2017 27 April 2005
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm

Pro 580 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 580 and All-In-Wonder X800 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 580 is a mobile workstation graphics card while All-In-Wonder X800 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 580
Radeon Pro 580
ATI All-In-Wonder X800 SE
All-In-Wonder X800 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 75 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 580 or All-In-Wonder X800 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.