Jetson T4000 vs Radeon Pro 575X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Blackwell (2024−2025)
GPU code namePolaris 20GB10
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date18 March 2019 (6 years ago)27 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481536
Core clock speed1096 MHz1665 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2525 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate140.3161.6
Floating-point processing power4.489 TFLOPS7.757 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs12864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L1 Cache512 KB3 MB
L2 Cache2 MB50 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data243 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1700 MHz1067 MHz
Memory bandwidth217.6 GB/s273.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 March 2019 27 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 40 Watt

Jetson T4000 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 575X and Jetson T4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 575X is a mobile workstation graphics card while Jetson T4000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 575X
Radeon Pro 575X
NVIDIA Jetson T4000
Jetson T4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 23 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Jetson T4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 575X or Jetson T4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.