Radeon 630 vs Pro 575

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated737
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.72
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 20Polaris 23
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date5 June 2017 (8 years ago)13 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048512
Core clock speed1096 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1218 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate140.338.98
Floating-point processing power4.489 TFLOPS1.247 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs12832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1695 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth217.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2017 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 50 Watt

Pro 575 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Radeon 630, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 140% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 575 and Radeon 630. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 575 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon 630 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 575
Radeon Pro 575
AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 98 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 575 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 34 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 575 or Radeon 630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.