NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro 575
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | 151 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Turing (2018−2021) |
GPU code name | Polaris 20 | N19E-Q3 MAX-Q |
Market segment | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 5 June 2017 (6 years old) | 27 May 2019 (4 years old) |
Current price | $448 | no data |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 1096 MHz | 780 - 960 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1380 - 1485 MHz |
Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 80 - 90 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 140.3 | 220.8 |
Floating-point performance | 4,506 gflops | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on Radeon Pro 575 and Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | no data | large |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | no data |
Width | IGP | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6780 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 217.0 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | no data | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | no data | + |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
VR Ready | no data | + |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | no data | 7.5 |
Advantages and disadvantages
Recency | 5 June 2017 | 27 May 2019 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 80 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 575 and Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Pro 575 is a workstation card while Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.