FirePro A320 vs Radeon Pro 575

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code namePolaris 20Trinity GL
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date5 June 2017 (8 years ago)6 June 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048384
Core clock speed1096 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data955 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate140.322.92
Floating-point processing power4.489 TFLOPS0.7334 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs12824
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1695 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth217.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2017 6 June 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 100 Watt

Pro 575 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 129% more advanced lithography process.

FirePro A320, on the other hand, has 20% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 575 and FirePro A320. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 575 is a mobile workstation graphics card while FirePro A320 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 99 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 575 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate FirePro A320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 575 or FirePro A320, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.