Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta vs Radeon Pro 5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking239not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.14no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameNavi 10NV5 B5
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 August 2020 (5 years ago)22 March 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speed1243 MHz100 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million15 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Wattno data
Texture fill rate194.40.2
Floating-point processing power6.221 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs1442
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 4x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz133 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s1.064 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 22 March 1999
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 250 nm

Pro 5700 has an age advantage of 21 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5700 and Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5700 is a workstation graphics card while Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 8 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 13 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5700 or Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.