GeForce 256 DDR vs Radeon Pro 5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking171not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameNavi 10NV10 A3
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)23 December 1999 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speedno data120 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million17 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm220 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Wattno data
Texture fill rate194.40.48
Floating-point performance6.221 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 4x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12 GB/s300 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s4.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 23 December 1999
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 220 nm

Pro 5700 has an age advantage of 20 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5700 and GeForce 256 DDR. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 256 DDR is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
NVIDIA GeForce 256 DDR
GeForce 256 DDR

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 179 votes

Rate GeForce 256 DDR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.