Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient vs Pro 5700 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking215not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.57no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 10Raven
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 August 2020 (5 years ago)23 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560704
Core clock speed1243 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1499 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate239.855.00
Floating-point processing power7.675 TFLOPS1.76 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs16044
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.21.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 23 April 2018
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 35 Watt

Pro 5700 XT has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

RX Vega 11 Efficient, on the other hand, has 271.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5700 XT is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient
Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 59 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 19 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5700 XT or Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.