Radeon R9 390 X2 vs Pro 5700 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking214not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.55no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNavi 10Grenada
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 August 2020 (5 years ago)3 September 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602560 ×2
Core clock speed1243 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1499 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt580 Watt
Texture fill rate239.8160.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power7.675 TFLOPS5.12 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs6464 ×2
TMUs160160 ×2
L1 Cacheno data640 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGP3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone4x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1350 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s345.6 GB/s ×2
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.21.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 3 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 580 Watt

Pro 5700 XT has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 346.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Radeon R9 390 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5700 XT is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 390 X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Radeon R9 390 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 58 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 39 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5700 XT or Radeon R9 390 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.