GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro 5700 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking216not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.59no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 10AD106
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date4 August 2020 (5 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25604608
Core clock speed1243 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1499 MHz1230 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate239.8177.1
Floating-point processing power7.675 TFLOPS11.34 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs160144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L1 Cacheno data4.5 MB
L2 Cache4 MB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 35 Watt

Pro 5700 XT has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4070 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 271.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5700 XT and GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5700 XT is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 60 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 46 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5700 XT or GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.