Radeon Pro WX 8100 vs Pro 570

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking384not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.69no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 20Vega 10
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date5 June 2017 (8 years ago)3 December 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17923584
Core clock speed1000 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed1105 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate123.8336.0
Floating-point processing power3.96 TFLOPS10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs112224
L1 Cache448 KB896 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1695 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth217.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs6x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2017 3 December 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 230 Watt

Pro 570 has 91.7% lower power consumption.

Pro WX 8100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 570 and Radeon Pro WX 8100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 570 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro WX 8100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 570
Radeon Pro 570
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
Radeon Pro WX 8100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 66 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 570 or Radeon Pro WX 8100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.