HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon Pro 560X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 560X with HD Graphics 630, including specs and performance data.

Pro 560X
2018
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
9.56
+207%

Pro 560X outperforms HD Graphics 630 by a whopping 207% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking464762
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.7914.31
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 21Kaby Lake GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date16 July 2018 (6 years ago)1 January 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024192
Core clock speed1004 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm++
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate64.2624.00
Floating-point processing power2.056 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs163
TMUs6424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 GB
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1270 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 560X 9.56
+207%
HD Graphics 630 3.11

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 560X 3677
+207%
HD Graphics 630 1197

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro 560X 7590
+339%
HD Graphics 630 1729

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro 560X 5699
+434%
HD Graphics 630 1067

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 560X 32449
+234%
HD Graphics 630 9715

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 560X 255217
+152%
HD Graphics 630 101178

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Pro 560X 1614
+339%
HD Graphics 630 368

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD38
+171%
14
−171%
1440p41
−56.1%
64
+56.1%
4K16
+23.1%
13
−23.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Elden Ring 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+343%
7
−343%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
Metro Exodus 36
+620%
5
−620%
Red Dead Redemption 2 36
+414%
7
−414%
Valorant 46
+2200%
2−3
−2200%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 44
+450%
8−9
−450%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Dota 2 46
+283%
12
−283%
Elden Ring 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Far Cry 5 42
+133%
18
−133%
Fortnite 55−60
+229%
16−18
−229%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
Grand Theft Auto V 33
+725%
4
−725%
Metro Exodus 23
+283%
6−7
−283%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 34
+21.4%
28
−21.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10
−10%
10−12
+10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+625%
4
−625%
Valorant 21
+950%
2−3
−950%
World of Tanks 86
+56.4%
55−60
−56.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 31
+288%
8−9
−288%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Dota 2 69
+214%
22
−214%
Far Cry 5 37
+270%
10
−270%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+164%
27−30
−164%
Valorant 26
+1200%
2−3
−1200%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Elden Ring 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+109%
21−24
−109%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
World of Tanks 57
+171%
21−24
−171%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry 5 24
+200%
8−9
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Valorant 19
+90%
10−11
−90%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Dota 2 13
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Elden Ring 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Metro Exodus 7
+250%
2−3
−250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 26
+333%
6
−333%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
World of Tanks 30
+233%
9−10
−233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9
+350%
2−3
−350%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Far Cry 5 12
+300%
3
−300%
Fortnite 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 0−1
Valorant 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%

This is how Pro 560X and HD Graphics 630 compete in popular games:

  • Pro 560X is 171% faster in 1080p
  • HD Graphics 630 is 56% faster in 1440p
  • Pro 560X is 23% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro 560X is 2200% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the HD Graphics 630 is 23% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 560X is ahead in 54 tests (93%)
  • HD Graphics 630 is ahead in 4 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.56 3.11
Recency 16 July 2018 1 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt

Pro 560X has a 207.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

HD Graphics 630, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 560X is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 560X is a mobile workstation card while HD Graphics 630 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560X
Intel HD Graphics 630
HD Graphics 630

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 193 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 560X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1258 votes

Rate HD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.