RTX A2000 Mobile vs Radeon Pro 5600M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Pro 5600M
2020
8 GB HBM2
24.04

RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro 5600M by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking211194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA (2019−2020)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 10GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date15 June 2020 (3 years old)12 April 2021 (3 years old)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602560
Core clock speedno data893 MHz
Boost clock speed1265 MHz1687 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate164.8108.6

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro 5600M and RTX A2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1540 MBps14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDAno data8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
−12.9%
79
+12.9%
1440p35−40
−17.1%
41
+17.1%
4K35−40
−8.6%
38
+8.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−89.7%
74
+89.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−31%
55
+31%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−5.1%
80−85
+5.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−6.3%
65−70
+6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−59%
62
+59%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−52.4%
96
+52.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−12.5%
72
+12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−4.9%
85−90
+4.9%
Hitman 3 70−75
−15.3%
83
+15.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−35.3%
69
+35.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−5.1%
40−45
+5.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−24.5%
66
+24.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−34.8%
62
+34.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+7.7%
39
−7.7%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−5.1%
80−85
+5.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−6.3%
65−70
+6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−28.2%
50
+28.2%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−39.7%
88
+39.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−10.9%
71
+10.9%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−4.9%
85−90
+4.9%
Hitman 3 70−75
−5.6%
76
+5.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−11.8%
57
+11.8%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−10%
44
+10%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−5.1%
40−45
+5.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−13.2%
60
+13.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−77.8%
96
+77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−10.9%
51
+10.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+31.3%
32
−31.3%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−5.1%
80−85
+5.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−5.1%
41
+5.1%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−31.7%
83
+31.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+8.5%
59
−8.5%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−4.9%
85−90
+4.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+8%
50
−8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+58.6%
29
−58.6%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−5.4%
35−40
+5.4%
Hitman 3 40−45
−20%
48
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−28.1%
41
+28.1%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−12.5%
27
+12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−25%
40
+25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−7.7%
27−30
+7.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−12.5%
27
+12.5%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−5.6%
55−60
+5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−66.7%
25
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−29.3%
53
+29.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−6.5%
49
+6.5%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−8.2%
50−55
+8.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−10.7%
30−35
+10.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−11.1%
20
+11.1%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−5.3%
20−22
+5.3%
Hitman 3 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+0%
17
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−26.9%
33
+26.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−30%
26
+30%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−8.7%
24−27
+8.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−5.9%
35−40
+5.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%

This is how Pro 5600M and RTX A2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 12.9% faster than Pro 5600M

1440p resolution:

  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 17.1% faster than Pro 5600M

4K resolution:

  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 8.6% faster than Pro 5600M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 58.6% faster than the RTX A2000 Mobile.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX A2000 Mobile is 89.7% faster than the Pro 5600M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is ahead in 5 tests (7%)
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is ahead in 61 test (90%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 24.04 25.52
Recency 15 June 2020 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 95 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro 5600M and RTX A2000 Mobile.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation card while RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 71 vote

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 86 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.