Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Pro 560 vs R9 M380
Combined performance score
Pro 560 outperforms R9 M380 by 25% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 506 | 447 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | no data | 14.06 |
Architecture | GCN (2011−2017) | Polaris (2016−2019) |
GPU code name | Strato Pro GDDR5 | Polaris 21 |
Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 16 June 2015 (8 years old) | 5 June 2017 (6 years old) |
Current price | no data | $127 |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 907 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 2,080 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 35 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 58.05 |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on Radeon R9 M380 and Radeon Pro 560 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | 1 | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
AppAcceleration | - | no data |
Enduro | - | no data |
FreeSync | 1 | + |
HD3D | + | no data |
PowerTune | + | no data |
DualGraphics | 1 | no data |
TrueAudio | + | no data |
ZeroCore | + | no data |
Switchable graphics | 1 | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | Not Listed | 2.0 |
Vulkan | no data | 1.2.131 |
Mantle | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Pro 560 outperforms R9 M380 by 25% in our combined benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
Pro 560 outperforms R9 M380 by 25% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
−27.3%
|
14−16
+27.3%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14−16
−26.7%
|
18−20
+26.7%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 9−10
−44.4%
|
12−14
+44.4%
|
Battlefield 5 | 21−24
−30.4%
|
30−33
+30.4%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24
−14.3%
|
24−27
+14.3%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
−27.3%
|
14−16
+27.3%
|
Far Cry 5 | 16−18
−29.4%
|
21−24
+29.4%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20
−27.8%
|
21−24
+27.8%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
−24%
|
30−35
+24%
|
Hitman 3 | 16−18
−35.3%
|
21−24
+35.3%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 14−16
−28.6%
|
18−20
+28.6%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
−23.1%
|
16−18
+23.1%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 16−18
−18.8%
|
18−20
+18.8%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 10−12
−36.4%
|
14−16
+36.4%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14−16
−26.7%
|
18−20
+26.7%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 9−10
−44.4%
|
12−14
+44.4%
|
Battlefield 5 | 21−24
−30.4%
|
30−33
+30.4%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24
−14.3%
|
24−27
+14.3%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
−27.3%
|
14−16
+27.3%
|
Far Cry 5 | 16−18
−29.4%
|
21−24
+29.4%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20
−27.8%
|
21−24
+27.8%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
−24%
|
30−35
+24%
|
Hitman 3 | 16−18
−35.3%
|
21−24
+35.3%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 14−16
−28.6%
|
18−20
+28.6%
|
Metro Exodus | 10−11
−30%
|
12−14
+30%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
−23.1%
|
16−18
+23.1%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 16−18
−18.8%
|
18−20
+18.8%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−20%
|
18−20
+20%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 10−12
−36.4%
|
14−16
+36.4%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14−16
−26.7%
|
18−20
+26.7%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 9−10
−44.4%
|
12−14
+44.4%
|
Battlefield 5 | 21−24
−30.4%
|
30−33
+30.4%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
−27.3%
|
14−16
+27.3%
|
Far Cry 5 | 16−18
−29.4%
|
21−24
+29.4%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20
−27.8%
|
21−24
+27.8%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
−24%
|
30−35
+24%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−20%
|
18−20
+20%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 10−12
−36.4%
|
14−16
+36.4%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−12
−18.2%
|
12−14
+18.2%
|
Hitman 3 | 12−14
−16.7%
|
14−16
+16.7%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−15.4%
|
14−16
+15.4%
|
Metro Exodus | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
Battlefield 5 | 8−9
−75%
|
14−16
+75%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−12
−27.3%
|
14−16
+27.3%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 10−11
−40%
|
14−16
+40%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−33.3%
|
16−18
+33.3%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
Hitman 3 | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−57.1%
|
10−12
+57.1%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 560 is 200% faster than the R9 M380.
All in all, in popular games:
- Pro 560 is ahead in 66 tests (97%)
- there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 7.20 | 8.97 |
Recency | 16 June 2015 | 5 June 2017 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
The Radeon Pro 560 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M380 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon R9 M380 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 560 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.