ATI Radeon 7000 vs Pro 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5481604
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.52no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code namePolaris 21RV100
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date18 April 2017 (8 years ago)19 February 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed907 MHz183 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate58.050.55
Floating-point processing power1.858 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs643
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/s2.928 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)7.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 560 3475
+173650%
Samples: 4
ATI 7000 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Fortnite 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33 no data
Valorant 85−90 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Dota 2 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Fortnite 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data
Valorant 85−90 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Dota 2 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data
Valorant 85−90 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 50−55 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12 no data
Metro Exodus 9−10 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 no data
Far Cry 5 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 20−22 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 no data
Metro Exodus 4−5 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 no data
Valorant 40−45 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10 no data
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 19 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 23 Watt

Pro 560 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7000, on the other hand, has 226.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 560 and Radeon 7000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 560 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon 7000 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 560
ATI Radeon 7000
Radeon 7000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 116 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 200 votes

Rate Radeon 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 560 or Radeon 7000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.