GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES vs Radeon Pro 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking545not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.48no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code namePolaris 21GF114
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date18 April 2017 (8 years ago)24 September 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024336
Core clock speed907 MHz779 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate58.0543.62
Floating-point processing power1.858 TFLOPS1.046 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs6456
L1 Cache256 KB448 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1280 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz1002 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/s128.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 24 September 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1280 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 160 Watt

Pro 560 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 220% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 113.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 560 and GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 560 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 560
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 115 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 15 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 560 or GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.