FirePro S9300 X2 vs Radeon Pro 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking551not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.53no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code namePolaris 21Capsaicin
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date18 April 2017 (8 years ago)31 March 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10244096 ×2
Core clock speed907 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate58.05217.6 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.858 TFLOPS6.963 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1664 ×2
TMUs64256 ×2
L1 Cache256 KB1 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1270 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/s512.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 31 March 2016
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 300 Watt

Pro 560 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 560 and FirePro S9300 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 560 is a mobile workstation graphics card while FirePro S9300 X2 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 560
AMD FirePro S9300 X2
FirePro S9300 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 116 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 8 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 560 or FirePro S9300 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.