GMA 3150 vs Radeon Pro 555X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5491576
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.85no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code namePolaris 21Pineview
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date16 July 2018 (7 years ago)9 May 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76816
Core clock speed907 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate43.540.8
Floating-point processing power1.393 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs161
TMUs482

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCI
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1275 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth81.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 555X 3235
+161650%
GMA 3150 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
God of War 16−18 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Fortnite 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 5 21−24 no data
God of War 16−18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Dota 2 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Fortnite 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 5 21−24 no data
God of War 16−18 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Dota 2 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
God of War 16−18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11 no data
Metro Exodus 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 no data
Valorant 85−90 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Far Cry 5 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 no data
God of War 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18 no data

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20 no data
Metro Exodus 3−4 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
Valorant 40−45 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 no data
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 27−30 no data
Far Cry 5 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
God of War 6−7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 July 2018 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 13 Watt

Pro 555X has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 476.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 555X and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 555X is a mobile workstation graphics card while GMA 3150 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555X
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 178 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 555X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 170 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 555X or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.