Jetson Nano vs Radeon Pro 555

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking579not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.71no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code namePolaris 21GM20B
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date5 June 2017 (8 years ago)March 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768128
Core clock speed850 MHz640 MHz
Boost clock speedno data921 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate40.8014.74
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS0.2358 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4816
L1 Cache192 KB48 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1275 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1
CUDA-5.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 10 Watt

Pro 555 has a 43% more advanced lithography process.

Jetson Nano, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 555 and Jetson Nano. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 555 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Jetson Nano is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 100 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 10 votes

Rate Jetson Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 555 or Jetson Nano, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.