ATI FirePro V8800 vs Radeon Pro 555

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking577not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.70no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code namePolaris 21Cypress
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date5 June 2017 (8 years ago)7 April 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681600
Core clock speed850 MHz825 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt208 Watt
Texture fill rate40.8066.00
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS2.64 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4880
L1 Cache192 KB160 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1275 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.6 GB/s147.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2017 7 April 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 208 Watt

Pro 555 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 177.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 555 and FirePro V8800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 555 is a mobile workstation graphics card while FirePro V8800 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 555
ATI FirePro V8800
FirePro V8800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 98 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate FirePro V8800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 555 or FirePro V8800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.