STG-2000 vs Radeon Pro 5500 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking324not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.66no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)no data
GPU code nameNavi 14NV1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 August 2020 (5 years ago)30 September 1995 (30 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed1187 MHz75 MHz
Boost clock speed1757 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate168.70.08
Floating-point processing power5.398 TFLOPSno data
ROPs321
TMUs961
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCI
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6FPM
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz50 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s400.0 MB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 1x DB13W3

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)1.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 30 September 1995
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 500 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 2 Watt

Pro 5500 XT has an age advantage of 24 years, a 819100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 7043% more advanced lithography process.

STG-2000, on the other hand, has 6150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5500 XT and STG-2000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5500 XT is a workstation graphics card while STG-2000 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 73 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 91 votes

Rate STG-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5500 XT or STG-2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.